Feb 20

coraline.jpg

Coraline
Henry Selik channels Neil Gaiman channeling a darker, stranger Roald Dahl

I’m beginning to think the English may need to brush up on their parenting skills. First, Roald Dahl wrote all those stories about children under the guardianship of some really awful grownups. Then J.K. Rowling wrote the wildly popular Harry Potter series, which opens with Harry’s abusive aunt and uncle forcing him to live in a tiny room beneath the stairs. Now there’s Neil Gaiman who wrote Coraline, the novel on which the eponymous movie is based, with a plot that once again relies on the tensions between a child’s playtime needs and her parents’ neglect of those needs.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jan 9

doubt.jpg

Why I believe in Doubt
By Jerilyn Covert

A great story, particularly one set against the backdrop of Catholicism, must always leave room for a little, well, doubt. And as the title suggests, the provocative new film Doubt leaves room for a lot of it. Biblical-sized portions, in fact. John Patrick Shanley, who wrote the play that the film is based on as well as the movie-script adaptation, has said that he chose the title for his Pulitzer Prize winning play before he even knew what it would be about. Maybe it was Shanley’s own Catholic upbringing, but the concept of doubt–and by that token, truth–clearly is something that intrigues him. In the film adaptation of his theatrical play, plot twists are thrown in the viewer’s path like roadblocks on her way to church. Set in 1964, in the thick of the Civil Rights movement, the film centers on the suspicions of Sister Aloysius Beauvier (Meryl Streep) that Father Brendan Flynn (Philip Seymour Hoffman) is sexually abusing a young black student–the school’s first. Alone in her crusade against the priest, Sister Aloysius may be on the side of the angels, but with little evidence and few options available to her within the constraints of an institution that places Father Flynn squarely above her in the church order, proving her allegations may be as impossible as proving the existence of God.
Read the rest of this entry »

Aug 3

swing-vote.jpg

So ridiculous, it just might happen
Release date: 1 August 2008

By Jerilyn Covert

Amid a box office lineup that includes superhero blockbusters, fantasy adventures, and a much anticipated science fiction sequel comes a film with a really fantastical premise–in which an entire presidential election boils down to just one vote. But before you decide to allocate your $9 toward a movie that’s a bit more realistic, like part three of The Mummy, consider casting your ballot for something unique. Swing Vote is a heartwarming comedy with a serious message, heavily tempered by Kevin Costner’s lovable “Oh, shit” demeanor and the dynamic between him and adorable newcomer Madeline Carroll, cast as the daughter whose political idealism would border on naiveté if she weren’t, in fact, smarter than many of the adults in the film. When an electronic voting machine at a polling booth in Texaco, New Mexico, is accidentally unplugged, one vote is lost. The voter name registered on the bum ticket: Earnest “Bud” Johnson (Costner), who like many of the townspeople, is unemployed, drinks a lot, and drifts through life on a gale of apathy. Suddenly, the two-party system that for so long has failed the working poor, has to win over the very man who epitomizes the group–well, except for the “working” part. With that, an implausible yet relevant tale unfolds in this uplifting, blue-collar-comedy-meets-political-satire account of how one ordinary man can impact the future of the free world.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jul 14

hancock.jpg

Will Smith signs his John Hancock to reclaim title as Fourth of July king
Release date: 2 July 2008

By Jerilyn Covert

Even superheroes have their rough patches. It just takes a super intervention, some homemade meatballs and an adoring young fan to get them through it. Such is the case with Hancock, a deadbeat alcoholic and a flying man with bulletproof skin. A hero and a menace. Until one day, an ambitious public relations analyst with a lot of faith and not much to lose offers to repair Hancock’s image. Except, as it turns out, the guy does actually have something to lose–namely, his wife, who gets pretty cozy with the flame retardant superhero. But don’t worry. It’s all part of the story. There’s also some action scenes, some laugh-worthy physical comedy, a running gag or two, bad guys, henchmen, lots of bottles of bourbon, a pretty big plot twist and a small handful of heartwarming moments. In other words, it’s got everything you’d want out of a 92-minute piece of mindless entertainment. And that’s precisely what it is.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jun 30

walle.jpg

Little bots have big hearts
Release date: 27 June 2008

By Jerilyn Covert

Leave it to Pixar to make robots that look so gosh darn cute. The animation film studio’s latest, Wall-E, is an entertainingly adorable film that tells the story of an artificial intelligence with a genuine heart. Imagine a science-fiction movie with all the zaniness of a cartoon and all the tenderness of a chick flick. Throw in some lovable characters and an enchanting voyage through space and you’ve got yourself 103 minutes of feel-good fun and a surefire candidate for an academy award. Writer/director Andrew Stanton, who’s also written screenplays for many of the Pixar classics, creates an eye-popping, extraordinar-E adventure that’s as much about the journey as it is the destination. At some point in the distant future, Earth has been rendered incapable of sustaining life, prompting mankind to get out of Dodge and make a break for the unconquered parts of the galaxy, and the planet they once called “home” is left to its toxically viscous seas and its endless piles of trash. Enter the lovable little robot, Wall-E (Waste Allocation Load Lifer–Earth class), a mechanical device programmed and assigned for cleanup. But after hundreds of years of performing his task–and, in his down time, re-watching old musicals–it seems Wall-E has developed some kind of glitch–namely, the ability to feel.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jun 14

happening.jpg

A twisted film without a twist
Release date: 13 June 2008

We loved M. Night Shyamalan’s new movie “The Happening,” but disagreed on the ending–that is, whether or not there was one. Was it a copout, or a smart move toward breaking his mold? Our point-counterpoint ensues!

She said . . .

Famous for making movies with surprising and complex plot twists, M. Night Shyamalan’s latest film, “The Happening,” has perhaps the greatest twist ending of all–none. And let me tell you, he really got me: I was so waiting for the big reveal, even making mental notes along the way of the parts I thought might end up being significant later on–like the half-empty glasses of water did in “Signs,” or the use of the color red did in “The Sixth Sense.” Alas, Shyamalan was simply too clever for me, and his ending–or, in this case, lack thereof–once again managed to catch me off guard. Perhaps I should have paid more heed to the part where teacher Elliot Moore (Mark Wahlberg) commends a student’s explanation for the disappearance of the bees, namely that it was an act of nature and we’ll never fully understand it. Don’t get me wrong: The movie as a whole was absolutely brilliant. Performances by Wahlberg and the lovely Zooey Deschanel, who plays his wife, were captivating and perfectly stylized. The dialogue was interesting and often hilarious. The plot was exquisitely bizarre and yet relevant–the headline about the bees could have been ripped right from a real-life newspaper. But Shyamalan is such a genius at crafting perfect endings, endings that shock, but also satisfy. In contrast, the beginning and middle of “The Happening” have all the same earmarks of a Shyamalan flick–adventure, intrigue, humor and a mystery that begs a solution. But unfortunately, the ending seems to have gone the way of the bees. –Jerilyn Covert

He said . . .

At what point in M. Night Shyamalan’s career would the twist ending seem contrived or gratuitous? In “The Happening,” Shyamalan abandons the big shock for a straightforward, horror-nature tale that comes across more Stephen King than Alfred Hitchcock. The ending as it is could not have worked out better for the creepy thriller with strong performances from its outstanding cast. The “big twist” has worked for Shyamalan in the past with mixed results, and I applaud his decision to let this story tell itself. Shyamalan was in danger of being pigeonholed as an artist with only one brush. I feel that if Shyamalan continued to bank on his now notorious twist endings he would cease growing as an artist and in time would loose his audience by utilizing the same trickery he used to gain them in the first place. I never felt cheated due to the lack of a big reveal or shocking twist and for the second straight time, he gives the audience something unexpected without trying to trick them. “The Happening” is a really good film with a really good ending, just as I expected it would be. –Joe DeRosa

Jun 13

the-incredible-hulk.jpg

A good Hulk. A better Hulk–but not incredible.
Release date: 13 June 2008

By Joe DeRosa

With the Spiderman and X-Men franchises, Marvel really set the bar for comic book adaptations on film. Now, coming hot off the turbine-jet propelled heels of “Iron Man,” which many critics and fans consider the best comic book movie to date, “The Incredible Hulk” lacks that same sort of punch. Though certainly solid and, overall, a decent film, “decent” is not incredible.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jun 8

vincent-price.jpg 10 of Vincent’s most priceless

This October 25 will mark 15 years since the death of Vincent Price, the legendary horror icon with the deep, sinewy voice and the flamboyant 6-foot-4-inch frame who played the suavest of villains in countless horror classics throughout the ’40s, ’50s and ’60s. With Friday the thirteenth around the corner, we thought it’d be fun to share 10 of the Master of the Macabre’s best. Of course, with so many fantastic films, it’s hard to whittle the list down. After all, over his half-century career, Price played in over 100 features and made more than 2,000 TV appearances, not to mention his performances on the stage. Among the features were a series of starring roles in Roger Corman’s garish but charming film adaptations based on the works of Edgar Allan Poe, including “The Masque of the Red Death” and “House of Usher,” but for this list, we decided to include just one from that series. We also left off “The Fly” and “Return of the Fly,” which are both great, but, if you haven’t heard of them yet, well, you’ve got bigger problems. And of course, “Edward Scissorhands,” as one of the best movies ever, needs no extra recognition from us. Besides, we wanted to stick with Price’s older films. Some are film-noir, and some are horror. Many were made on a low budget, and all are absolute must-sees. So add them to your Netflix queue to watch at your leisure, or dig in and pull an all-day marathon this Friday. After all, as Price told a newsman in 1971, “Horror movies don’t date because they were dated to begin with, they were mannered and consciously so–Gothic tales with an unreality. They have the fun of a fairy tale.”

Read the rest of this entry »

May 30

sex-and-the-city.jpg

“I couldn’t help but wonder: Did the critics have it wrong?”
Release date: 30 May 2008

By Jerilyn Covert

Somewhere, in a fantasyland version of Manhattan inhabited by fashion socialites Carrie Bradshaw, Charlotte York, Miranda Hobbes and Samantha Jones, the term “repression” bears no meaning. Today, the “Sex and the City” heroines, bouncing about in the kind of fashion labels most of us recognize by virtue only of red-carpet specials, made their much anticipated, “Big” screen debut, though many fans saw the movie last night, at midnight showings scattered across the nation. (At our local movie theater, empty seats were harder to find than Manolo Blahniks on sale.) As a born-again fan of the popular HBO series, I have to admit that early buzz on the film, which some critics have portrayed as little more than a glorified Cinderella tale, had me somewhat concerned. Had our girls grown tame with age? Would the racy sex talk dissolve into giddy-girlfriend babble? And now that they all had husbands or lovers, would they–could they?–still wear their independence like badges on their sleeves, prominently displayed beside their pricey Prada handbags? But as I watched the film–and the trendy, parodic twentysomethings who sat entranced in the dark–I realized something, something I think some critics have overlooked. You see, “SATC” has always been something of a paradox, a strange marriage of feminist ideals–and stiletto high heals. Furthermore, this hybrid may be the greatest of all evidence of social change. And it certainly explains why, while Carrie’s single womanhood may be at stake, she still uses her oven as storage for sweaters. Read the rest of this entry »

May 22

indiana-jones.jpg

Indy’s latest adventure is out of this world
Release date: 21 May 2008

By Jerilyn Covert

Bompa dum dum . . . bompa dumm . . . bompa dum dum . . . bompa dum dum dum! Oh John Williams, your classic score is instantly recognizable. And it’s the perfect background music to accompany Indiana Jones as he escapes from the bad guys–yet again!–and, latching onto a high beam with the tale-end of his trusty whip, swings valiantly into action. . . . “Damn, I thought that was closer,” Indy says, after missing his landing. Indeed, in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, the fourth installment of the popular ’80s action-film series, Harrison Ford is not as young as he used to be. But instead of glossing over Ford’s advancing age (64), the filmmakers incorporate it into the story, which takes place about 20 years after The Last Crusade. Back then, it was the Nazis Indy was fighting, but this time it’s communists–KGB Russian operatives. They want Indy to help them find a crystal skull, which will provide the means to golden treasures and limitless power. Read the rest of this entry »

« Previous Entries